In student ministries not too long ago had a series on the Kingdom of God, which would make Ron Sider (and Jesus) happy:
Unless Matthew, Mark, and Luke are totally wrong, all who want to preach and live like Jesus must place the “kingdom of God” at the center of their thought and action.
Sider suggests that to best understand what Jesus meant when he announced the kingdom to his listeners, we need to understand the Jewish messianic hope which was derived from the prophets. With this in mind, imagine being present at the synagogue in Nazareth when Jesus read a very messianic passage from the prophet Isaiah …
(1) The Spirit of the Sovereign LORD is on me,
because the LORD has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted,
to proclaim freedom for the captives
and release from darkness for the prisoners,
(2) to proclaim the year of the LORD’s favor
and the day of vengeance of our God,
to comfort all who mourn,
(Isaiah 61:1-2, TNIV)
… and then clearly said, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
That is huge.
Jesus was announcing that the kingdom had come, though he made it clear in further parables that it had not yet reached its culmination. As one Caedmon’s Call song goes, and as our experience in life attests, death [and sin and the devil] is on a long leash.
This is a kingdom of the already and the not yet, and there is a great quote from some dude named Mortimer Arias, who said,
Jesus, who had announced the Good News to the poor in this life, still had Good News for the poor beyond this life, when nothing could be expected from history. Jesus’ evangelization, therefore, is truly holistic – for this world and for the world to come!
You may not be used to agreeing with things the Pope says, but I thought these words from the late John Paul II were right on:
The kingdom of God is not a concept, a doctrine, or a program subject to free interpretation, but it is before all else a person with the face and name of Jesus of Nazareth, the image of the invisible God. If the kingdom is separated from Jesus, it is no longer the kingdom of God which he revealed.
Consider Sider’s comment, that “Jesus, the kingdom, and all the blessings of the kingdom are inseparable [and that] one cannot have the ethics of the kingdom or the forgiveness of the kingdom apart from Jesus.” What do you think of that assertion? In adhering to a limited, one-side view, have we somehow missed the boat completely? What do you think has been the cost of neglecting the other dimensions of the kingdom all this time?
